What do you want to do? The military offers many thrilling and rewarding careers within all the branches. While you may think you want to work in one particular branch, you should keep an open mind and know that many of the same jobs are offered within multiple branches.
U.S. Army | 212 Military Occupational Specialties (MOSs) for active duty personnel in such fields as: Administrative Services
Combat Operations
Electronic Maintenance
Engineering and Construction
Health Care
Intelligence and Electronic Communications
Mechanical Maintenance
Media, Public and Civil Affairs | ~*~ ~*~ ~*~
U.S. Navy | Over 100 careers in such fields as: Arts and Photography
Aviation
Business Management
Computers
Construction
Education
Electronics
Engineering
Finance and Accounting
Information Technology
Intelligence, Law Enforcement
Legal
Medical and Dental
Music
News and Media
Special Operations
Transportation and Logistics
World Languages | ~*~ ~*~ ~*~ U.S. Air Force | Over 150 careers in such fields as: Administration
Avionics
Base Operation
Communications
Electronics
Engineering
Flying/Navigation
Information Technology
Intelligence
Medical
Professional
Special Forces
Weapons Systems | ~*~ ~*~ ~*~U.S. Marine Corps | Over 300 MOSs in 35 career fields, including: Personnel & Administration
Intelligence
Logistics
Engineering
Data/Communications
Transport
Public Affairs
Legal Services
Electronics and Aircraft Maintenance
Avionics | ~*~ ~*~ ~*~
U.S. Coast Guard Over 20 jobs for enlisted personnel in: Deck and Ordnance
Engineering
Administration
Science
Aviation
Port Security ~*~ ~*~ ~*~
A Excellent Military Opportunity
Army Secretary Noel Harvey and Gen. Richard Cody, the vice chief of staff, said that the Army is using looser Defense Department rules that permits it to sign up more high school dropouts and people who score lower on mental-qualification tests, but they denied that this meant it was lowering standards. Until Army recruiters began having trouble signing up enough recruits earlier this year, the Army had set minimum standards that were higher than those of the Defense Department. The Army has had a recruiting shortfall of 6,000 to 8,000 soldiers during the past 12 months. It hasn't fallen so short of its annual goal since 1979, several years after the Vietnam War. Harvey and Cody addressed the recruiting issue in news conferences during the annual convention of the Association of the U.S. Army. The Department of Defense "standards on qualification tests call for at least 60 percent Category 1 to 3 [the higher end of testing] and 4 percent Category 4," the lowest end, Harvey said. "The other services follow that standard and the Army National Guard always followed it as well. But the active Army chose a standard of 67 percent in Categories 1-3, and 2 percent Category 4." It now will use the Defense Department guidelines. Cody said that increasing the number of people with General Education Diplomas allowed to enlist in the Army wasn't really a lowering of standards. GEDs are certificates granted in lieu of high school diplomas to dropouts who can pass an examination. The Army's figures show 6.5 percent of all enlisted soldiers held GED certificates at the end of 2004, the last year statistics were available. The Army plans to keep its limit on new soldiers with GEDs at 10 percent in any year. He said the number of soldiers on recruiting duty is increasing from 9,000 to 12,000, and the Army is asking Congress to increase enlistment bonuses from a maximum of $20,000 to a new limit of $40,000 for some who choose branches where there are shortages. The advertising budget for the Army was being boosted by $130 million.
US Pushes Japan To Break Deadlock Over Relocation Of Air Base
The United States prodded Japan to break a deadlock over the relocation of a key US air base so that an accord on the realignment of American troops in Japan could be forged by November when President George W. Bush visits the country. The relocation of the Futenma Air Base in the southern Japanese island chain of Okinawa is at the center of prolonged negotiations under what is being proposed as a defense transformation realignment pact between the United States and its top ally in Asia. A senior Pentagon official involved in the negotiations told reporters that to break the deadlock, Japan should consider the overall interest of its half a century military alliance with the United States. “The replacement of the Futenma capability is an alliance issue, not an American issue. It is an alliance issue,” stressed Richard Lawless, the deputy undersecretary of defense for Asian and Pacific affairs. He said the United States had rejected a Japanese relocation proposal but did not give details. It is believed that the Japanese wanted to shift the Futenma operations inside Camp Schwaba, a major US Marine base in the Okinawa city of Nago. The Americans sought a smaller facility inside a reef in Henoko district, also in Nago. “We have made our feelings known. We have asked for more information but at the present time, the opportunity that we’re being offered by the Japanese government is not acceptable to us, so the discussions are continuing,” Lawless said. He said both sides knew that “it is absolutely essential” to find a solution based on a promise made by Japan nine years ago -- ”something that is of quality replacement that allows us to sustain that presence for the alliance. “That is why we are saying to the Japanese government -- you undertook this obligation in 1996 to replace Futenma, we’ve been waiting. “It is not our fault, we want you to help us replace Futenma for the benefit of the alliance because the alliance needs this capability, as simple as that,” Lawless told reporters after testifying in the US Senate on US-Japan relations. Okinawa, which accounts for less than one percent of Japan’s land mass, remains the base for 65 percent of the 40,500 US troops in the country, and is next to the potential conflict area of the Taiwan Strait. Okinawa sees frequent protests against the US troops, who are stationed in officially pacifist Japan by treaty, blaming them for noise and crime. Lawless defended the US option, saying it “gives us more in the way of capabilities.” He said the issue must be resolved by November through an interim report containing an “agreement in principles” on all the major issues -- including military “roles, missions, capabilities as well as realignment” of American troops in Japan. “We would like to have it done in an October/November time frame and the final report done no later than four to six months,” he said. “That would suggest that we finish everything up no later than in Spring. “We can’t have an agreement on the major principles without resolving the Futenma issue,” he said. President Bush is widely expected to visit Japan in the middle of November before attending a summit meeting of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum on November 18-19. Relations between Japan and the United States have strengthened considerably since Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi took office just after Bush was elected to his first term in office in 2000. The two key pending bilateral issues are Japan’s reluctance to lift a 21-month-old ban on US beef imports, and the relocation of the air base. Aside from providing logistics support to US troops in Iraq, Japan is a key participant in the US-led Proliferation Security Initiative and is involved in a US ballistic missile defense project.
|